The so called "Lost Gospels"

ChatGPT

I can’t even count the number of times I have heard the phrase “the lost gospel” of so and so says this or that. Drives me nuts and makes me sad to see this out there among Christians.

They’re treated like some long-hidden conspiracy buried underneath a mountain of security clearance, and it just got whistle-blowen. 

The problem, though, is that they were never lost in the first place.

Using the word “lost” doesn’t make them special or some secret God didn’t reveal to us.

First and foremost, these books aren’t in the Christian Bible. 

If you say you are a Christian yet whip out the Enochs, Maccabees, Gad the Seer, Wisdom, Tobit, Judith, etc, when trying to prove a view, doctrine, or use it to object to something in the Bible. You're not even on the right track to begin with. If you're not a believer and do this, then that’s a whole different conversation.

Remember, this is God we’re talking about here. The Creator of the whole universe, the Creator of the eyeball, the Creator of DNA. 

He didn’t “lose” anything.

Dead Sea Scrolls.

Yes, the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1946, and fragments and scrolls (a few) of these so-called lost gospels were found, but they were hardly lost; these writings and/or what they taught were already in circulation way before they were found. 

There is no giant conspiracy to be had here.

Pause for a moment.

Do you believe in the Bible and its authority, or do you hold satan’s hand to pursue what you want to believe instead? This is a valid question to ask any Christian who gives these writings any authoritative or Biblical weight.

I like to tell people, you either trust God or you don’t; the same goes for the Bible. Either you trust it, or you don’t. There is no mix-and-match game here, so who are you walking with?

Not even sure where to begin with these “lost” gospels.

Here’s one: What was found in 1946 was already in circulation during Jesus’s time; they weren’t “lost” as I stated before. 

When Jesus was in the midst of His ministry, neither He nor His disciples quoted, referenced, or made those texts authoritative. These “lost” teachings show us the world that Jesus was walking into when He started His ministry.

Now, I know a few of you have heard that Jesus quoted the book of Enoch. On the surface, sure that’s what it looks like, until you find out that the book of Enoch took “shall inherit the earth” from the book of Psalms.

He didn’t. You can read all about that here.

Here’s another: Just because these texts were in circulation among people doesn’t make them correct or authoritative. We have how many books on religion circulating out there now, spinning off all sorts of stuff. 

Are you going to tell me those are authoritative as well, just because they quote the Bible or have some spin on it?

Another point: They were already not included by the religious leaders of the day, and for many valid reasons. 

Such as, but not limited to — 

• Proven discrepancies. (Judith 1:1 — Claims Nebuchadnezzar was king of Assyria in Nineveh, but he was actually king of Babylon.

• Salvation by works and not through faith.

• Writings about “secret” knowledge. (Gnostic)

• Contradictory moral teachings.

• Writings were intended to alter the history of Jesus to suit ulterior purposes.

• The Bible has a united purpose. These texts seek to disrupt that.

• The Gospel of Thomas was written far too late in history to have been written by the Apostle Thomas.

• In one, Jesus is described as disrespectful and spiteful.

• None were written by prophets.

• Tobit also includes some freaky witchcraft voodoo stuff, directed by that angel on how to deal with a demon, that's so not Biblical.

• Some contain elaborate, whimsical, and wild tales that completely contradict the Bible. (Enoch being a big one there)

• The Book of Judith celebrates the seed of Simeon, even though he is actually cursed; also, the book of Judith praises her lies and deceit.

• Praying for the dead. (2 Maccabees 12:42–45 — this little nugget is where Catholicism validates purgatory, which btw, is not in the Bible, but is a great financial boon for them.)

• Giving of alms to cleanse sins. Tobit 12:9 and Sirach 3:30 (Catholicism jumped on that one too.)

• Forgiveness of sins by prayer alone.

• The book of Wisdom used to proclaim that Mary was without sin. (Inmaculate Conception)

• Parts of Sirach glorify wealth.

• Numerous contradictions within the books themselves

• Baruch is absent from the Hebrew canon, which was finalized by the Jewish community long before Christ.“First of all, the Jews have been entrusted with the very words of God.” Romans 3:2 

• Writers from the different sects in the area took liberties to modify them as they saw fit.

  
  

I could honestly keep going.

While yes, these “lost” books can hold historical value for the sake of understanding culture, what Jesus was walking into, where beliefs, myths, doctrines etc… came from, heck, I owe every one one of them for research purposes myself, but they are far from accurate and ultimately fall short of Biblical inspiration. 

The Bible is my gold standard; if a book doesn't align with the word of God, it’s out, plain and simple. This should be your standard as well.

Look at it this way: who’s really talking to you?

The Holy Spirit or some other spirit? 

“But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them — bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.” 2 Peter 2:1–3

I know, I know some of you guys are spitting fumes right now at me because you want so badly for things in these books to be true and still claim you are a Christian. But you can’t, I’m sorry, it just doesn't work like that. 

These texts/books/teaching/writings were never accepted into the Hebrew canon back then, they were never affirmed by Jesus or the apostles, and lack consistent prophetic authority, doctrinal harmony, and historical accuracy.

You want to use uninspired works to discredit inspired works.

Good luck with that. 

Ultimately, it is always your choice, but think about your choices. 

Do they take you away from the Bible? 

Then there’s a problem.

© Jane Isley

---

Thank you for taking the time to read, and please consider supporting my work. Your gift helps keep this work going, blesses others, and means the world to me.

You can visit me at Faithful Writers on Medium, where other Christian writers have joined me in sharing the word of God. You can also find me on Tumblr and Facebook.